![](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DPH2E5Zaago/TcmoxHB7vQI/AAAAAAAAHys/w_lbHxNYEwk/s400/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-05-10%2Bat%2B22.06.46.png)
![](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-v2L7-JLf4-s/TcmXUjPhw-I/AAAAAAAAHyM/3aaFLg7DPeY/s400/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-05-10%2Bat%2B20.46.05.png)
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mvzquWcHoyo/TcmXUU4BT8I/AAAAAAAAHyE/eDqrQpojF58/s400/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-05-10%2Bat%2B20.50.20.png)
![](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZX4xG_lLs6I/TcmXUPDJXAI/AAAAAAAAHx8/qYSoskRsmCY/s400/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-05-10%2Bat%2B20.52.08.png)
following on from the thick type idea. I've tried out some other bold typefaces. uppercase and lower case.
I also really like using the different shades of grey to highlight the individual letters like I did with the other logo
but it doesnt seem to work as well with this typeface. I think it looks better when the type is more intricate.
I also tried out different compositions with the letter,overlapping etc but I think its important to have a clear shape of the type so people can identify with them. eg. looking at a log from a distance, if the person recognises the shape its likely that they will recognise the logo
No comments:
Post a Comment